General Obligation & Revenue Bonds
Overview
- Municipal bonds are issued by states, cities, counties, and other political subdivisions. They’re one of the main ways local governments borrow money to fund public projects. Many roads, schools, and parks are built with money raised through municipal bond offerings.
- National politics often gets the most attention, but state and local decisions tend to shape day-to-day life more directly. Money raised in the municipal debt market affects local services, infrastructure, and overall quality of life.
- Municipal bonds are typically structured like other bonds. Most pay semi-annual interest to investors seeking income. The capital (money) raised through offerings is used to hire employees, expand operations, and build new facilities.
🔑 The two primary forms of municipal debt:
- General obligation (G.O.) bonds
- Revenue bonds
G.O. bonds vs Revenue bonds — master comparison
| Feature | General obligation (G.O.) bonds | Revenue bonds |
|---|---|---|
| Projects funded | Non-self-supporting projects (do not generate revenue) | Self-supporting ventures (do generate revenue) |
| Examples | Schools, roads, parks, government buildings | Toll roads, airports, stadiums, city zoos, convention centers, water treatment plants |
| Repayment source | Property taxes (ad valorem taxes) | Revenues earned from the municipal venture |
| Backing | Full faith, credit, and taxing power of the municipality; typically not backed by specific collateral | Project revenues; not taxpayer funds |
| Voter approval | Needed to raise property taxes if short of debt-service funds | ⚠️ Not required to issue |
| Debt limits | (Subject — G.O. bonds rely on taxing power) | ⚠️ Not subject to debt limits |
| Default risk | Very rare to default | Higher — revenue bonds default at 13 times the rate of G.O. bonds |
| Pre-issuance analysis | Economic diversity, population trends, municipal obligations, tax collection figures | Feasibility study by independent consultants |
Both “no voter approval” and “not subject to debt limits” apply to revenue bonds because they are not paid off with taxpayer funds.
General obligation (G.O.) bonds
What they fund
G.O. bonds are a common type of municipal bond. They fund important projects for a city, state, or local area that don’t generate revenue. These are called non-self-supporting projects, meaning the project does not produce enough revenue to pay for itself.
Common examples include schools, roads, parks, and government buildings.
How they are repaid
When a G.O. bond is issued, the municipal government borrows from investors and repays them over time. Because the project itself doesn’t generate revenue to cover debt service, the municipality must use taxes to repay the borrowed funds. Specifically, G.O. bonds are paid off with property taxes.
| Term | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Property taxes / ad valorem taxes | Annual tax bill from local government based on how much and what type of property an owner holds | Supports school districts, police departments, park maintenance, and city libraries |
| Non-self-supporting project | A project that does not make revenue | Schools, roads, parks, government buildings |
🔑 The funding cycle for a new non-self-supporting project:
- Raise money through a G.O. bond issuance
- Use the proceeds to pay for the project
- Use property taxes over time to repay investors
Backing
- G.O. bonds are typically not backed by a specific form of collateral. Instead, they are backed by the full faith, credit, and taxing power of the municipality.
- ⚠️ Full faith and credit bonds are generally not as safe as secured bonds, but a municipality’s taxing power is a major source of support.
- If a state or local government is short of funds needed to pay debt service on a G.O. bond, it can raise property taxes with voter approval.
What strengthens or weakens a G.O. bond
Raising taxes isn’t always a complete solution. A municipality’s ability to repay G.O. bonds can also be affected by population trends, economic diversity, and existing municipal obligations.
| Factor | Strengthens a G.O. bond | Weakens a G.O. bond |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Larger / growing population (bigger tax base) | Population decline (fewer taxpayers) |
| Economy | More economically diverse tax base | Reliance on a single dominant industry |
| Obligations | Lighter municipal obligations | Heavy municipal obligations such as pensions |
Case study — Detroit
- The city of Detroit filed for bankruptcy in 2013, which is still the largest municipal bankruptcy filing in US history.
- Contributing factors: a declining population, a single dominant industry (auto industry), and significant pension obligations.
- When a municipality’s population declines, the local government loses taxpayers. This is one reason local leaders try to attract residents and businesses: more people and businesses generally means a larger tax base.
- Detroit grew around the automobile industry. When the industry was strong, it supported jobs, wages, and a stable local economy.
- By the time of the Great Recession of 2008, conditions had changed. The economy experienced the largest financial collapse since the Great Depression in the 1920s and 1930s. During economic downturns, consumers often delay purchases of durable goods like automobiles.
- Auto sales plunged in 2008 and 2009, creating major problems for Detroit. With so much of the city tied to one industry, business closings and layoffs affected large portions of the population. Over the following years, many residents left to seek opportunities elsewhere, which further reduced the city’s tax base.
Definitions
| Term | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Durable good | A product that lasts a long period of time | Automobiles, water heaters, refrigerators, furniture, etc. |
Pensions as a municipal strain
| Term | Definition | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Pension | Retirement plan generally only offered by government entities today; a retiree receives an ongoing benefit after retirement, typically for life | Many plans require at least 20 years of service to qualify; benefit is often a percentage of the worker’s earnings (for example, 80% of the worker’s highest year of earnings) paid throughout retirement |
Pensions provide lifetime retirement income, but they can be costly for employers. The issuer is responsible for making payments regardless of its financial condition. Even if a municipality is under financial stress, pension payments still must be made. In Detroit’s case, pension payouts added to the strain during the late 2000s and early 2010s.
Summary
In summary, G.O. bonds fund state and local projects that don’t generate their own revenue. Repayment depends on the municipality’s ability to collect property (ad valorem) taxes. Factors that can strengthen a G.O. bond include a larger population and a more economically diverse tax base. Factors that can weaken it include population decline, reliance on a single industry, and heavy municipal obligations such as pensions.
Revenue bonds
What they fund
Municipal revenue bonds fund projects that do generate revenue. If your city operates a facility that brings in money, it was likely built (at least in part) with funds raised through a revenue bond issue.
Examples of ventures supported by revenue bonds:
- Toll roads
- Airports
- Stadiums
- City zoos
- Convention centers
- Water treatment plants
These projects serve public needs while also generating operating revenue.
Feasibility studies
| Term | Definition | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility study | A report that forecasts the profitability of a municipal venture | Prepared by independent consultants hired by the municipality |
| Self-supporting venture | A project that makes revenue to pay off borrowed funds | Aquarium charging admission |
Before issuing a revenue bond, a municipality typically evaluates whether the project can realistically produce enough revenue to cover its costs.
For example, suppose a city wants to build an aquarium that will charge admission. The aquarium will cost millions of dollars, and taxpayer money won’t be available for it. To estimate the project’s earning potential, municipalities hire independent consultants to prepare feasibility studies.
If the feasibility study forecasts a profitable aquarium, the city can move forward with construction. A self-supporting revenue bond is issued to the public, and the capital raised is used to build the aquarium. Revenues earned from the aquarium are then used to pay off the bond over time.
🔑 Most revenue bonds are considered self-supporting because they do not rely on taxes to repay borrowed funds. Because of that:
- ⚠️ Revenue bonds do not require voter approval to be issued.
- ⚠️ Revenue bonds are not subject to debt limits.
Risks
Default risk
- While most municipal securities are safe from default risk, defaults can still occur.
- It’s very rare for G.O. bonds to default, but revenue bonds face higher levels of default risk.
- 🔑 Revenue bonds default at 13 times the rate of G.O. bonds.
- Even so, revenue bond defaults are still fairly rare in the broader financial markets.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is much more common than default risk for municipal bonds.
| Data point | Figure |
|---|---|
| Trading frequency of many municipal bonds | Fewer than 50 times a year |
| Average daily trading volume, Treasury securities (YTD through May 2026) | Approximately $1,241 billion |
| Size of the municipal market (Q1 2026 estimate) | Approximately $4.5 trillion |
| Wyoming population (July 2025) | Approximately 588,753 |
- Liquidity risk is driven by the size and activity of the trading audience. If you try to sell a municipal bond issued by your city, you’re typically selling to a relatively narrow group of potential buyers — often other investors interested in that municipality or region. Municipal investors generally don’t trade with a national or global audience the way corporate and U.S. government security investors do.
- ⚠️ This liquidity risk isn’t caused by the overall size of the municipal market — the municipal market is large (~$4.5 trillion as of Q1 2026). Instead, liquidity risk is often most noticeable in smaller municipalities.
- Example: even though Wyoming’s population sounds sizable, only a fraction of residents participate in the municipal bond market. Of those who do, only some will be willing and able to trade at the moment an investor needs to sell. As a result, bonds from Wyoming — and especially from smaller cities or localities within Wyoming — can face significant liquidity risk.
- 🔑 In general, the smaller the municipality, the higher the liquidity risk.
Yield / tax-bracket risk (opportunity cost)
- Municipal bonds offer tax-free income, but that benefit comes with a tradeoff: lower yields.
- Issuers can often offer lower yields because investors don’t pay taxes on the interest.
- ⚠️ While this isn’t the most severe risk, an investor in a low tax bracket should generally avoid municipal investments. Otherwise, they may face opportunity cost if other investments could provide a higher after-tax return.
Definitions
| Term | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunity cost | Monetary value of missed opportunities | An investor keeps their money in a short-term security yielding 3% instead of investing in a long-term security that provides a 10% return. The opportunity cost (missed return) is 7% |
Advance refunding
Municipal issuers sometimes refinance outstanding debt before the bonds can be called. This process is known as advance refunding.
| Term | Definition | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Advance refunding | Refinancing outstanding municipal debt before it can be called | Commonly used when interest rates fall, allowing the issuer to reduce debt service costs |
| Refunding bonds | The new bonds issued | Their proceeds are deposited into an escrow account |
| Refunded bonds | The outstanding bonds being replaced | Paid from the escrow until redeemed, often at their first available call date |
| Escrow account | Where refunding-bond proceeds are deposited | Typically invested in U.S. Treasury securities, which provide the interest and principal payments needed to pay the refunded bonds |
| Defeasance | The process by which the escrowed Treasury securities effectively replace the municipality’s pledge as security for the bonds | Results in very high credit ratings |
| Pre-refunded bonds / escrowed-to-maturity (ETM) bonds | Alternate names for advance-refunded bonds | — |
The 90-day rule
| Timing of redemption of the refunded bonds | Classification |
|---|---|
| More than 90 days after issuance of the refunding bonds | Advance refunding |
| Within 90 days | Current refunding |
- Because advance-refunded bonds are backed by U.S. government securities held in escrow, they often carry very high credit ratings and lower yields than comparable municipal bonds.
- Taxation: if the original bonds were tax-exempt municipal securities, the interest generally remains federally tax-exempt after the refunding.
Taxation notes stated on this page: municipal bonds offer tax-free income (the reason issuers can offer lower yields), and advance-refunded municipal interest generally remains federally tax-exempt. No state or local tax treatment is specified on this page.
Key points
Non-self-supporting projects
- Do not make revenue
General obligation bonds
- Fund non-self-supporting projects
- Paid off with property (ad valorem) taxes
Used to analyze G.O. bonds
- Economic diversity
- Population trends
- Municipal obligations
- Tax collection figures
Self-supporting ventures
- Make revenue to pay off borrowed funds
Revenue bonds
- Paid off with revenues from municipal ventures
- Finance self-supporting municipal ventures
- No voter approval is required
- Not subject to debt limits
Feasibility studies
- Forecast profitability of a municipal venture
- Created by independent consultants
Municipal bond risks
- Revenue bonds have a higher risk of default than G.O. bonds
- Liquidity risk
- Low yields (opportunity cost)
Advance refunding
- Refunding bonds refinance outstanding debt before it can be called
- Proceeds are placed in a Treasury-backed escrow account to pay refunded bonds
- Advance refunding = redemption after 90 days
- Current refunding = within 90 days
- Bonds become defeased, often receive higher ratings, and may be called pre-refunded or ETM bonds
Sources
Primary/official references for the material in this chapter. Every link was fetched and returned HTTP 200 on 2026-08-15.
| # | Source | Publisher |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Office of Municipal Securities — muni market regulation | SEC |
| 2 | Municipal securities rulemaking — dealer and adviser rules | MSRB |
| 3 | Official statements, continuing disclosure, muni trade prices | MSRB (EMMA) |
| 4 | Topic 403 — interest received, taxable vs tax-exempt | IRS |
| 5 | Achievable Series 65 — chapter 1.2.8 | Achievable (course text) |